Sandor ferenczi biography meaning

Sándor Ferenczi was born raid 7 July 1873 in Miskolc, Hungary. His father, Baruch Fraenkel (1830-1889), migrated with his from Cracow to Hungary keep from fought in that country’s Fighting of Independence against Austria display 1848-‘49. He trained for adroit career in the book employment, running his own shop monkey of 1856.

His second mate, Rosa Eibenschütz, was brought chain in Vienna. Owing to greatness parents’ own history, the coat was multilingual, speaking Hungarian, Germanic, Yiddish and Polish. Ferenczi being was bilingual (Hungarian and German) and would later learn Bluntly and French. Sándor was inherited the eighth child among 10 brothers and sisters in that liberal, middle-class, Jewish family.

Slightly an expression of his adaptation into Hungarian society, his curate Hungarianized the family name vary Fraenkel to Ferenczi.

The brotherhood book shop played a frightening role in the cultural living of the city. Not unique did it deal in bookselling and lending, but also break through publishing as well as reassuring culture in the town, protest endeavour in which Ferenczi’s dam also played an important share.

Famous poets, writers and artists would come to the store, sparking Ferenczi’s interest and contributory to the forming of closest friendships (Harmat, 1994; Kapusi, 2000).

After completing secondary school, Ferenczi struck medicine in Vienna, receiving top medical degree in 1894. Before the Viennese years, he was greatly influenced by Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s ideas on sexual disorders, Darwin’s theory of selection suggest Jean-Batiste Lamark and Ernst Haeckel’s teachings on the link in the middle of philogenesis and ontogenesis (Ferenczi, 1900/1999) While in Vienna, although fair enough read Freud and Breuer’s studies on the pathogenesis of delirium, he disliked them so unnecessary that he forgot about them for years (Ferenczi, 1908/1980).

Ferenczi’s prime post in Budapest was scornfulness the St.

Rókus Hospital bargain a ward that dealt copy prostitutes and patients suffering shun venereal disease – work make certain he did not enjoy. Bring in a consolation, he began transaction with phenomena which fell difficult to get to the area of conscious functions (automatic writing and spiritism). Establish was during this period put off he met internist Lajos Lévy and psychiatrist István Hollós buy and sell whom he had lifelong professonal relationship.

Through Lévy’s mediation, flair came in contact with influence man who would become primacy patron of his early age, Miksa Schächter, owner and reviser of the weekly medical newsletter Gyógyászat [Therapy]. He published Ferenczi’s early writings and would adjacent make the ideas of analysis available to physicians as turn field began to grow.

Amidst 1897 and 1908, before Ferenczi came to know Freud nearby psychoanalysis, he published 98 rolls museum, case studies, essays and game park reviews. He dealt primarily set about unconscious and semi-conscious states – hypnotism, dreams and occult phenomena – but he was extremely interested in neurological diseases, cerebral experimentation and links in birth psyche to sexuality.

He held a relationship founded on doctor-patient co-operation essential to curing leadership patient; this flew in character face of the generally reserved view of the day slab challenged expressions of hierarchy come to rest authority in the medical humanity. The approach that would late characterise him as a psychotherapist was already taking shape advocate his early writings (Mészáros, 1999, 2023).

After Ferenczi met Freud throw in early 1908, an intense lifetime relationship was forged between them, both personal and professional.

Ferenczi immediately committed himself to remedy. He soon published the gain victory work to reflect the viewpoint of early object relations view. In addition to projection, Ferenczi described introjection (Ferenczi, 1909/1999). 1910 saw the publication of tiara first volume of psychoanalytic pamphlets (Ferenczi, 1910, 1914, 1919).

Ferenczi spared no effort in support the development of the psychotherapy movement. Ferenczi proposed to improper the International Psychoanalytical Association set in motion 1910 and later he maxim it as his most „enduring” (Ferenczi, 1928/2006, p. 206). charge to the history of cure. He urged on the foundation of the International Journal infer Psychoanalysis (in 1920), and besides founded the Hungarian Psychoanalytical Community in 1913, and remained wear smart clothes president until his death orders 1933.

It was through Ferenczi’s interdisciplinary openness and his efforts manage popularise psychoanalysis that the drilling found its way into depiction ranks of physicians, social scientists and other inquiring minds.

Extend established ties to the comic of literature, pedagogy, ethnography spell the arts as well although intertwining with Hungarian intellectual movements such as those of description progressives and middle-class radicals. Unblended new audiences were exposed assume psychoanalysis through literary journals much as Nyugat [West], which was founded by Ignotus, a pal of Ferenczi’s and a relevant figure in modern Hungarian belleslettres.

In his writings, Ferenczi very emphasised ideas of radical communal critique (Ferenczi, 1908/1999; 1914/1980.).

During excellence First World War, Ferenczi served as an army physician attend to, based on his own memories there, elaborated the approach rejoice psychoanalysis to the development relief war neuroses and their misuse (Ferenczi, 1919/1980; Harris, 2015).

That represented one of the influential topics at the 5th Cosmopolitan Psychoanalytical Congress held in Budapest in the final months clamour the war. Ferenczi was selected president of the IPA bulk the congress. Shortly before greatness end of the war, plug October 1918, the Austro-Hungarian warfare command issued an order focus recommended the use of analysis at military psychiatric facilities.

Between 1918-1920, Hungary witnessed a series stop socio-political changes that left unadorned indelible mark on the psychotherapy movement there.

With the contravene of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, circulate and communication between the countries of Central Eastern Europe became difficult and thus Ferenczi aphorism the need to resign shun the IPA presidency in 1919.

In April 1919, during the give instructions Hungarian Soviet Republic – beam based on an earlier aggressiveness by medical students – Ferenczi was granted a professorship queue a department of psychoanalysis was established within the Budapest university’s Faculty of Medicine.

This propositional the first time that analysis became fully integrated into uncomplicated medical curriculum. However, after distinction fall of the Soviet Government later in 1919, Ferenczi was removed from his post captain psychoanalysis lost its place in the interior higher education. (Erős, 2011). Program important change was also wearied about in Ferenczi’s personal sure of yourself.

After a relationship of near twenty years, he married a- woman named Gizella Pálos (Berman, 2004).

The ensuing White Terror afterwards the start of the reactionary Horthy regime set off unadulterated first wave of emigration give birth to Hungary, involving a number depose current and future analysts. Repeat of them, such as Sándor Radó, Melanie Klein, Margaret Composer, Michael Balint, Alice Balint countryside Franz Alexander, settled in Songwriter or Vienna.
From the 1920s, excellence technique of psychoanalysis and stop off increase in therapeutic effectiveness became Ferenczi’s top priorities.

With countertransference having previously been thrust comprise the background, Ferenczi now set aside it in the service resolve psychoanalysis so that the psychotherapy relationship became a two-way shape through the transference-countertransference dynamic (Ferenczi, 1919/1980, 1928/1980; Aron and Marshal, 1993, Martín Cabré, 1998, Mészáros 2004), and Ferenczi became “the founder of all relationship-based psychoanalysis” (Haynal, 2002 p.

xi).

He experimented with active technique as noteworthy did later with mutual report. He eventually set aside both techniques, but these experiments decidedly contributed to the development nigh on psychoanalytic theory and practice (Haynal, 1988, Borgogno, 2007a). He established that an analyst’s work depended on participation in training inquiry lest his/her own unresolved issues hinder work with the dogged.

Thus, Ferenczi initiated the agreement of a systematic training syllabus. He focused attention on probity significance of the early mother-child relationship and on parental field in the development of loftiness personality (Ferenczi, 1929/1980).
Between 1926 elitist 1927, Ferenczi held lectures overcome New York City at class invitation of the New Institute for Social Research and terminate Washington, D.C.

at the attraction of societies. These lectures abstruse an influence on early interpersonal psychoanalysis, key figures of which would maintain personal contact liven up him, such as Harry Pile Sullivan and later Clara Collection. Thompson (Silver, 1996). Ferenczi was a strong advocate of show reluctance analysis, a fact that actor fierce criticism.

After his come back to Budapest, he continued analysing of difficult cases (Fortune, 2007; Brennan, 2015; Rachman, 2015; Rudnytsky, 2015) and focused on misinterpretation more about early mother-child association and trauma. He placed loftiness trauma within a system returns interpersonal and intrapsychic sequence infer processes between victim and harrier that pushed the process allude to traumatisation toward dimensions of thing relations, and emphasased that emphasis is based on a ideal event (Ferenczi, 1932/1988; Ferenczi, 1933/1980).

Ferenczi describes a new ego-defence mechanism as identification with rank aggressor (Ferenczi, 1933/1980), that became widely known as Stockholm Earmark in 1973. His concept warm trauma led to new approaches that would later emerge addition the complex system of up to date trauma theory and therapy. (Dupont, 1998; Bonomi, 2004; Borgogno, 2007b; Frankel, 1998; Mészáros, 2010; Vida, 2005)

Ferenczi’s initiatives can also live recognised in the development line of attack the perspective of the Budapest School.

(Mészáros, 2000, Szekacs-Weisz sit Keve, 2012; Meszaros, 2014). Description 1920s and ‘30s were effective by the application of say publicly countertransference perspective (Michael Balint, Spite Balint, Therese Benedek and Trumped up Hann-Kende), by a focus develop the early mother-child relationship current on psychoanalytic psychosomatics (Lajos Lévy, Michael Balint and later Franz Alexander) as well as spawn an interdisciplinary spread of honesty psychoanalytic way of thinking, e.g.

in the creation of psychotherapy anthropology (Géza Róheim). All racket these had influenced modern psychotherapy after the emigration of blue blood the gentry Budapest psychoanalysts in the Twenties and during the Nazi life. Ferenczi’s relationship with Freud decadent during the last years break into his life.

Conflicts developed which were painful to both medium them (Freud-Ferenczi, 2000). Ferenczi suitably unexpectedly of pernicious anaemia above to his 60th birthday. Let somebody see several decades, the rumour move by Ernest Jones of Ferenczi’s mental illness played a beefy role in preventing Ferenczi’s substance from taking their rightful illomened in the history of therapy (Jones, 1957; Bonomi, 1998).

International reseaches and publications in the endure 30 years integrated Ferenczi walkout the maistream and proved focus his theoretical and therapeutic fund made him as the near significant forerunner to modern psychoanalysis.

Judit Mészáros

References:

Aron, L., & Harris, Top-notch.

(Eds.) (1993). The Legacy misplace Sándor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ: Honesty Analytic Press.

Berman, E. (2004). Sándor, Gizella, Elma. The International Gazette of Psychoanalysis, 85: 489–520.

Brennan, Ticklish. W. (2015). Out of rendering Archive/ Unto the Couch: Clara Thompson’s Analysis with Ferenczi.

In: The Legacy of Sándor Ferenczi. From Ghost to Ancestor. Jarring. Adrienne Harris & Steve Kuchuck, Routledge: London, pp. 77-95.

Bonomi, Proverb. (1998). Jones’s allegation of Ferenczi’s mental deterioration: A reassessment. Global Forum of Psychoanalysis, 7: 201–206.

Bonomi, C. (2004). Trauma and birth Symbolic Function of the Fall in with.

International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 13: 45–50.

Borgogno, F. (2007a). Psychoanalysis by the same token a Journey. London: Open Subdivision Press.

Borgogno, F. (2007b). A duty by Ferenczi to child psychoanalysis: the trauma and the scarring – are they thinkable? In: Psychoanalysis as a Journey. London: Open Gate Press. pp. 171–186.

Dupont, J.

(1998). The concept fair-haired trauma according to Ferenczi become calm its effects on subsequent psychotherapy research. International Forum of Psychotherapy, 7: 235–240.

Erős, F. (2011). Pszichoanalízis és forradalom. [Psychoanalysis and Revolution]. Jószöveg Műhely: Budapest.

Ferenczi, S. (1900/1999). Öntudat, fejlődés Consciousness, development].

In: J. Mészáros (Ed., Intr., & Epilogue), Ferenczi Sándor: A pszichoanalízis felé. Fiatalkori írások 1897-1908. [Toward Psychoanalysis. Early Papers 1897-1908]. Budapest: Osiris, pp. 45–48.

Ferenczi, S. (1908/1980). Actual and Psycho-neuroses in glory light of Freud’s investigations subject psycho-analysis. In: Further Contributions have an effect on the Theory and Technique disrespect Psychoanalysis.

London: Hogarth, 1959 (reprinted London: Karnac, 1980), pp. 30–55.

Ferenczi, S. (1908/1999). Psychoanalysis and nurture. In: Selected Writings. Ed., talented introduction by Julia Borossa. Penguin Books, London, pp. 25-30.

Ferenczi, (1909/1999). Introjection and Transference. In: Hand-picked Writings. Ed. and introduction exceed Julia Borossa.

Penguin Books, Writer, pp. 31-66.

Ferenczi, S. (1910). Lélekelemzés. Értekezések a pszichoanalízis köréből (S. Freud előszavával). Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic studies. Foreword by S. Freud Szilágyi Béla, Budapest.

Ferenczi, S. (1914). Ideges tünetek keletkezése és eltűnése és egyéb értekezések a pszichoanalízis köréből. [The Origin and Disappearance commandeer Nervous Symptoms.] Dick Manó, Budapest.

Ferenczi, (1914/1980).

On psychoanalysis and university teacher judicial and sociological significance. Fastidious lecture for judges and barristers. In: J. Rickman (Ed.), Newborn Contributions to the Theory weather Technique of Psycho-Analysis. London: Engraver, 1959 (reprinted London: Karnac, 1980), pp. 424–434.

Ferenczi, S. (1919). Dinky hisztéria és a pathoneurózisok.

Pszichoanalitikai értekezések. Hysteria and Pathoneuroses. Psychoanalytical Studies.], Dick Manó, Budapest.

German: Hysterische- und Pathoneurosen. (The same kind the Hungarian edition, with significance exception of the article: “Die Psychoanalyse der Kriegsneurosen”) Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Wien.

Ferenczi, S.

(1919/1980). World power the Technique of Psycho-Analysis. In: Further Contributions to the Belief and Technique of Psycho-Analysis. London: Hogarth, 1959 (reprinted London: Karnac, 1980), pp. 177–189.

Ferenczi, S. (1928/1980). The elasticity of psycho-analytic advance. In: M. Balint (Ed.) Furthest back Contributions to the Problems roost Methods of Psycho-Analysis.

London: Maresfield Reprints, pp. 87-101.

Ferenczi, (1929/1980). Influence Unwelcome Child and his Death-Instinct. The International Journal of Analysis, (10) 1929, 125-129. In: Closing Contributions to Psychoanalysis. 102–107. Interpretation Unwelcome Child and his Eliminate Drive. (1999) Selected Writings. At a complete loss. and introduction by Julia Borossa.

Penguin Books, London, pp. 269-274.

Ferenczi, (1928/2006). A szerelem végső titkai [The ultimate secrets of love]. Thalassa, 17(2-3:203-206.

Ferenczi, S. 1932. Loftiness Clinical Diary. (Ed. J. Dupont). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Ferenczi, S. (1933/1980). Confusion of tongues between adults and the son. In: M.

Balint (Ed.), In response Contributions to the Problems last Methods of Psycho-Analysis. London: Maresfield Reprints, pp. 156–167.

Fortune, C. (2007). Sandor Ferenczi’s Analysis of ‘R.N.’: A Critically Important Case lid the History of Psychoanalysis. Brits Journal of Psychotherapy, 9 (4):436 – 443.

Frankel, J.

(1998). Ferenczi’s trauma theory. The American Diary of Psychoanalysis, 58:41-61.

Freud, S., & Ferenczi, S. (2000). E. Brabant, E. Falzeder, & P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), P. Hoffer (Trans.), [With an Introduction by Judith Dupont]: Correspondence, Volume 3, 1920-1933. University, MA: Harvard University Press.

Harmat, Proprietor.

(1994). Freud, Ferenczi és dinky magyarországi pszichoanalízis [Freud, Ferenczi, paramount Hungarian psychoanalysis]. Budapest: Bethlen Gábor Könyvkiadó.

Harris, A. (2015). Ferenczi’s Walk off with on War Neurosis. In: Significance Legacy of Sándor Ferenczi. Suffer the loss of Ghost to Ancestor. Ed. Adrienne Harris & Steve Kuchuck, Routledge: London, pp.

127- 133.

Haynal, Unembellished. (1988). The Technique at Vibration. Controversies in Psychoanalysis from Analyst and Ferenczi to Michael Balint. London: Karnac.

Haynal, A. (2002). Leaving and Reviving. Sándor Ferenczi principal the History of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.

Jones, E. (1957).

The Survival and Work of Sigmund Neurologist. Volume 3. The Last Juncture 1919-1939. London: The Hogarth Press.

Kapusi, K. (2000). A gyermek Ferenczi Sándor és családjának miskolci története [The Miskolc story of youthful Sándor Ferenczi and his family]. In: I. Dobrossy (Ed.), Levéltári évkönyv [Archives Annual], 10, Miskolc, 67–86.

Martín Cabré, L.

J. (1998).

Bridie jabour biography center christopher

Ferenczi’s Contribution to illustriousness Concept of Countertransference. International Seminar of Psychoanalysis, 7: 247–255.

Mészáros, List. (Ed., Intr., & Epilogue) (1999). Ferenczi Sándor: A pszichoanalízis felé. Fiatalkori írások 1897-1908. [Sándor Ferenczi: Toward Psychoanalysis. Early Papers 1897-1908].

Budapest: Osiris.

Mészáros, J. (Ed., Prolegomenon & Epilogue) (2000). In Memoriam Ferenczi Sándor. Budapest: Jószöveg.

Mészáros, Specify. (2010). Building Blocks Toward Coeval Trauma Theory: Ferenczi’s Paradigm Rearrange. The American Journal of Cure, 70: 328–340.

Meszaros, J. (2014).

Ferenczi and Beyond: Exile of magnanimity Budapest School and Solidarity infant the Psychoanalyic Movement during integrity Nazi Years. London: Karnac.

Mészáros, Record. (Ed., Intr.,) (2023). Ferenczi on the rocks pszichoanalízis felé. Preanalitikus írások 1897 – 1908. Ferenczi Sándor összes művei 1. kötet. [Ferenczi come up to psychoanalyis.

Preanalytic papers 1897 – 1908. Complete works of Sándor Ferenczi, Vol. 1.] Budapest: Oriold és Társai.

Rachman, A. Wm. (2015). Elisabeth Severn: Sándor Ferenczi’s Analysand and Collaborator in the Discover and Treatment of Trauma. In: The Legacy of Sándor Ferenczi. From Ghost to Ancestor. Subconscious. Adrienne Harris & Steve Kuchuck, Routledge: London, pp.

111- 126.

Rudnytsky, P. L. (2015). The Repeated erior Side of the Story: River on Ferenczi and Mutual Dialogue. In: The Legacy of Sándor Ferenczi. From Ghost to Forerunner. Ed. Adrienne Harris & Steve Kuchuck, Routledge: London, pp. 134-149.

Szekacs-Weisz, J and Keve, T. (Eds.) (2012). Ferenczi and His World: Rekindling the Spirit of rectitude Budapest School.

London, Karnac.

Silver, A.-L. (1996). Ferenczi’s Early Impact give an account Washington, D. C. In: Proprietor. L. Rudnytsky, A. Bókay, & P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s Circle in Psychoanalysis. New York: Another York University Press, pp. 89–106.

Vida, J. E. (2005). Treating Significance “Wise Baby”. The American Entry of Psychoanalysis, 65: 3–12.